Please enjoy this brief audio discussion regarding the psychology of choice in which I discuss several examples of the influence of the subconscious and of time on our choices.
Example #1: Volunteers were given scrambled sentences and one group was given a group of scrambled sentences that were about rudeness and the other group was given a group of scrambled sentences about being patient. The group that had just found the words relating to rudeness were much more likely to interrupt the interviewer’s phone conversation. Very interesting.
Example #2: The other example they did is they had again 2 groups but this time one group got scrambled sentences with words to be found about being old and the other group had random words. These two groups of participants were then timed from when they left the office, where the testing was done till they reach the elevator and they found that there is a significant slower pace to the group of people that were finding the words that were related to being old elderly.
Example #3: One group was asked to think of a very smart person and then answer trivial pursuit type questions vs. another group that was asked to think of a very stupid person and then answer the same trivial pursuit type questions. The group thinking of the smart person did better at answering the trivial pursuit questions!
Example #4: Finally the last example is from the tipping point by Malcolm Gladwell and in this book he discusses a very interesting story regarding the good Samaritan. Princeton University psychologist met with a group of seminarians people studying to become a pastor’s and they were trying to answer the question who would stop and help a person who is slumped in the alley head down, eyes closed coughing and groaning. One group was told that they were late to the class that they were going to teach and they are expected in only a few minutes so they better get moving quickly. The other group were told that they have enough time to get over to the classroom. What they found was that on several occasions the seminary students going to give their lecture which was actually on the parable of the good Samaritan literally stepped over the mock victim as he hurried on his way. What they say is of the group that was in a rush 10% stopped to help, but of the group that was not in a rush that had some time to spare 63% stopped and helped. This study suggests that the convictions of your heart and the actual contents of your thoughts are less important in the end in guiding one’s actions than the immediate context of your behavior.
All of these studies suggest that we as individuals must be very cognizant of the world around us and to influence it in a positive way, to show a good character, we must be aware of our surroundings and slow down. Those with truly great character do the right thing no matter if they are late for a meeting nor are they influenced in a negative way by their surroundings.